NRA Files Amicus Brief Asking Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to District of Columbia’s Magazine Ban

The NRA’s brief argues that D.C.'s ban on magazines of 10 or more rounds is unconstitutional.

by
posted on April 3, 2025
Nra Logo Periwinkle

On March 31, 2025, the National Rifle Association and Second Amendment Foundation filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to grant certiorari in a challenge to the District of Columbia’s ban on the possession of magazines that hold over 10 rounds.

The plaintiffs petitioned the Supreme Court to hear the case after the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals denied the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. The D.C. Circuit ruled that the District’s magazine ban is likely constitutional because it is consistent with nineteenth-century Bowie knife regulations.

The NRA’s brief argues that the ban is unconstitutional and that the Supreme Court should hear the case to clarify the proper test for evaluating Second Amendment claims established in District of Columbia v. Heller and New York State Rifle & Pistol, Ass’n v. Bruen.

Under Supreme Court precedent, if arms are “in common use,” they cannot be banned. Because Americans lawfully own hundreds of millions of magazines that hold over 10 rounds, the District’s ban on such magazines violates the Second Amendment.

The D.C. Circuit, however, held that despite 10+ round magazines’ commonality, they can be banned consistent with Bowie knife regulations from the nineteenth century. NRA’s brief points out, however, that even if common arms can be banned—despite the Supreme Court holding otherwise—the Bowie knife laws cannot justify the District’s magazine ban.

First, the only statute banning the possession of Bowie knives was held unconstitutional. Second, lesser, non-prohibitory historical regulations—such as laws prohibiting the concealed carry of Bowie knives, imposing sentence enhancements for their use in crimes, or taxing their ownership—cannot justify a modern prohibition on particular arms. Third, since no evidence in the case suggests that Bowie knives were in common use at the time they were regulated, Bowie knife restrictions cannot serve as historical analogues for restrictions on arms in common use today. Finally, because repeating arms capable of firing over 10-consecutive shots predate the Second Amendment by over 200 years and were never prohibited before the twentieth century, it is improper to rely instead on the tradition of Bowie knife regulations.

The brief was filed in Hanson v. District of Columbia.

Latest

Daniel Defense Sherp Giveaway
Daniel Defense Sherp Giveaway

How to Win Guns & Gear at the NRA Annual Meetings

The short answer is "show up and walk around the exhibit hall," and the longer answer is below (yes, you still want to read it).

Show Ponies! 3 Annual Meetings Booths with Crazy Custom Colts

Calling all Colt fans: These three booths have the tricked-out Colt guns of your dreams.

First Impressions: Dead Air X Ruger RXD Series Suppressors

Two legendary manufacturers team up to create an all-new line of suppressors.

First Impressions: Taurus 58 Pistol

Smart design, modern materials, and high capacity come together for an ideal option for EDC (Everyday Carry) and range use alike.

Caught in a Staredown: What to Do

Uh-oh! The animal you're hunting saw you ... but you might still have a chance if you follow these tips.

First Impressions: Henry Repeating Arms HUSH Series Rifles

Fresh out of Henry's Special Products Division, these rifles are optimized for suppressors.

Interests



Get the best of NRA Family delivered to your inbox.